A prospective multicentre phase III validation study of AZGP1 as a biomarker in localized prostate cancer.

Department of Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown. Cancer Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research/The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst. Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown. Department of Urology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Crows Nest. Department of Urology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia. Three Stories Consulting - Global Health Advocacy, USA. Department of Urology, St Vincent's Clinic, Darlinghurst. Discipline of Medicine, University of New South Wales. Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology. 2017;(8):1903-1909

Abstract

BACKGROUND Prostate cancers (PCs) with similar characteristics at the time of diagnosis can have very different disease outcomes. Conventional biomarkers of PC still lack precision in identifying individuals at high risk of PC recurrence. While many candidate biomarkers are proposed in the literature, few are in clinical practice as they lack rigorous validation. This study prospectively enrolled an independent phase III cohort to evaluate the clinical utility of zinc-alpha 2-glycoprotein (AZGP1) as a prognostic biomarker in localized PC. PATIENTS AND METHODS In our multicentre, prospective phase III study, AZGP1 status in 347 radical prostatectomy specimens was assayed by immunohistochemistry in a NATA-accredited laboratory. The AZGP1 score was assessed in a multivariable model incorporating established prognostic factors. We also report extended outcomes from our previous phase II study. The primary endpoint was biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS). Secondary endpoints were metastasis-free survival (MFS) and PC-specific survival (PCSS). RESULTS In the phase II cohort, with a median follow-up of 15.8 years, low/absent AZGP1 expression was an independent predictor of poor BRFS (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.9; P = 0.03), MFS (HR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.2-6.6; P = 0.02) and PCSS (HR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.5-9.5; P = 0.005). These results were validated in our prospective phase III cohort. Low/absent AZGP1 expression independently predicted for BRFS (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.3; P = 0.02), with shorter MFS (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.4; P = 0.02). AZGP1 improved the discriminatory value when incorporated into existing prognostic risk models. CONCLUSION Our study provides prospective phase III validation that absent/low AZGP1 expression provides independent prognostic value in PC. This study provides robust evidence for the incorporation of this biomarker into clinical practice.

Methodological quality

Publication Type : Clinical Trial ; Multicenter Study

Metadata